Pac-12-10 Name?

This topic has 13 replies, 13 voices, and was last updated 2 years, 6 months ago by Tony (admin).

Viewing 7 reply threads

Author

Posts
- 11/01/2022 at 12:26 PM #176970
  2
  
  Tony (admin)
  Keymaster
  
  When USC and UCLA are gone, and assuming there are no replacements, is the Pac-12 going to be renamed back to the Pac-10? Seems like maybe a rebrand would be in order to just “Pac.”
- 11/01/2022 at 12:32 PM #176971
  8
  
  EagleMountainUte
  Participant
  
  Conference formerly know as PAC12
- 11/01/2022 at 12:34 PM #176972
  3
  
  EagleMountainUte
  Participant
  
  Escape from LA….
- 11/01/2022 at 1:19 PM #176976
  4
  
  DrahtUte
  Participant
  
  It’s our conference now and tying the name to the number of teams is a pain. Let’s just make it what we want and honor Ty Jordan and Aaron Lowe at the same time.
  
  It will now be the PAC-22 conference!
- 11/01/2022 at 1:22 PM #176977
  2
  
  cj13
  Participant
  
  BIG12 and 10 don’t have the same number of teams as their number either
  - 11/01/2022 at 1:34 PM #176980
    7
    
    Utah
    Participant
    
    True, true, true…My only add would be to rename the PAC-12 to the PAC-10. That is what is has always been. We will be at 10 teams, we will be in the PAC10. Let’s go back.
    
    And then when USC and UCLA come back in 5 years, we can just keep it at the PAC-10.
- 11/01/2022 at 1:50 PM #176983
  9
  
  ProudUte
  Participant
  
  Just call it PAC. We don’t need a number. If we add teams later – we won’t need to change it again.
  - 11/01/2022 at 2:39 PM #176994
    2
    
    Uphoric
    Participant
    
    Yup!! This!
- 11/01/2022 at 3:27 PM #176998
  2
  
  PlainsUte
  Participant
  
  Pac-N, Pac-11-MOL (more-or-less)
  Pac-N could lead to some creative show names on the Network, Pac-N-Heat, Pac-N-Lunch, etc.
  - 11/01/2022 at 4:08 PM #177000
    4
    
    RedRocks
    Participant
    
    Pac-N-Lunch … haha
- 11/01/2022 at 5:31 PM #177006
  2
  
  AlaskaSteveUteAlum
  Participant
  
  I’m not sure that they will actually go to the Big Ten. There will be major hurdles to overcome:
  1) A large number of alumni and fans don’t like the move.
  2) Travel to away games won’t be easy for their fans
  3) Many of their away games will be played early for the Pacific time zone.
  4) The increased school payout may not cover the travel costs for all sports.
  5) Logistical scheduling issues with a 16 team conference may become a negative for the schools and their fans.
  6) A possible increase in school payout negotiated by the PAC-12 may substantially reduce the difference between them and the Big Ten.
  
  This may appear as wishful thinking, but I think that they are legitimate issues.
  - 11/01/2022 at 6:04 PM #177014
    2
    
    Charlie
    Participant
    
    Is there a commit date for the LA schools still coming?
  - 11/01/2022 at 9:17 PM #177023
    4
    
    Extra Medium
    Participant
    
    There are $80-$100M reasons a year they will be going to the Big X. USC and UCLAs presidents torpedoed expansion and nixed the $1B joint venture with the PAC-12 network that would have solidified the conference for the next 10-15 years then bailed. I hope they go the big X and get their asses kicked every single year and lose all their fans because nobody in California cares about Iowa, Northwestern, Minnesota or Nebraska. Screw them…I wish were were invited though.
  - 11/02/2022 at 10:12 AM #177036
    
    wcrunner
    Participant
    
    $$$$$$$
Author

Posts