From the Big 12 conference’s perspective, the best scenario is Utah and Kansas State having good seasons (both beating OSU in the process) and meeting in the title game with a possibility of both teams making it into the CFP, as Utah and KSU don’t play each other in the regular season.
I agree. I guess the problem is that a second Big XII entrant into the CFP would cut into the B1G’s allocation. The article talks about that issue and I personally find it hard to believe that the Big XII and the B1G would have the same number of entrants into the CFP.
That seems fair. I am happy to move some pressure and hype to K-State for a bit. I hope we get to test out their sophomore quarterback in the championship game.
Evidently, they do. Of the toughest tests on their schedule — Oklahoma State, Kansas and Iowa State — only the game against the Cyclones is on the road.
I saw someone do some rankings of the B12 schedule. Utah’s was the 4th easiest. KSU and Kansas both had easier schedules. I don’t remember who the third was, but it was either OSU or AZ. It seems the B12 is setting up their contenders for success.
I agree thirty four. I’d rather be under the radar but that isn’t the case. The big 12 will be out to prove us wrong. We have the pieces and depth to prove it.