FOOTBALL
Welcome to Ute Hub › Forums › Utah Utes Sports › Football › FOOTBALL
- This topic has 12 replies, 11 voices, and was last updated 33 minutes ago by
Utah#1.
-
AuthorPosts
-
-
ALUF
ParticipantFinally, basketball is over so we can talk about what I believe most of us actually give a damn about. How are we all feeling about each of the position groups? Which side of the ball are we more excited about? How does the feeling towards the team as a whole feel? What about the schedule?
I just want to read other people’s thoughts on the 2025 Utes
-
Tony (admin)
KeymasterMan I’ve choked on the koolaid the last couple of seasons. I’m coming in conservatively across the board. I hope we can generate any kind of at least mediocre offense and we’ll start from there. Special teams have been pretty meh too. I trust Morgan will have the D ready.
-
Tednab
ParticipantRetain what we have and if Dampier lives up to the hype and stays healthy , we should be at least bowl eligible.
-
D T
ParticipantIF DD rises to the hype & remains relatively healthy, we’ll be more than bowl-eligible.
-
-
Utah#1
ParticipantNot your fault! IMO, Whitt and the media led many on thinking the team was going to be better than the previous years. That may have been true, but one exception, Whitt can be the one to blame for the nose dive in the program. I think it is safe to say he is not very good at judging QB talent and ability, and significantly miscalculated and/or misdiagnosed his assessment or analysis of that position group.
The past two years, he put his eggs all in one basket and it backfired on him in a big way! I don’t think Utah would have ended as badly as they did last year had he not tried a different QB after the Arizona or TCU games. He stuck with it and it burned him.
I don’t trust Whitt on the offensive side of the ball. That will be his achilles heel and I don’t expect him to change with a new OC. It will be very hard for him to keep his hands out of the cookie jar. He’s a run first run heavy football coach and I see him overusing the new RB Wayshawn Parker. Hope I’m wrong, but BYU’s Sitake lets his coaches coach and look what happened. Whitt’s a control freak and I don’t see him changing even if it meant him going undefeated and winning a Big12 CC that way.
-
-
TheNuschler
ParticipantTwo words: BOWL ELIGIBLE!
-
AlohaUte
ParticipantOur defense will be solid again. We’ll be strong on the line and at LB. I’m sure we’ll be fine at secondary, but I would like to see a bit if an alteration in scheme. It seems our pass defense has been very much bend not break, but often breaks more than it should.
Everything else on the team i have no idea about. The whole offense is a crap shoot. I’m not convinced that UNM transfer will be the starter at QB, he might, but there is some talent in the room. So we’ll see.
The position I’m most worried about is RB. We need a strong run game.
-
alexsmith
ParticipantKW was on ESPN 700 the other day with Checketts and was asked a question following up on a comment by Beck stating Dampier would be the starter. KW responded with “as of today, Dampier would be the starter.” He then continued later in the statement to say that Isaac Wilson is developing quite well in the offense so I would anticipate that he would be the current #2.
-
-
chinngiskhaan
ParticipantWe will be more fun to watch this year than we were the last two years. That is what I am hoping for. I’m excited to FINALLY be moving on from Rising. It really is too bad we didn’t move on from him two years ago, because I thought Ludwig’s system was great for the kind of guys we can get (tight ends and running backs with decent QB play).
The biggest disappointment for me the last couple of years has been the terrible talent at RB. We didn’t sign the right guys, and we didn’t coach up the guys we did sign. The RB room has been terrible, and I’m glad we cleaned house in that regard.
-
UteBacker
ModeratorIn interesting side-effect of this whole NIL and transfer portal nightmare is the impossibility to predict how good a team is going to be (at least for me anyway). There are a bunch of patchwork teams out there that we just have no idea how well they’re going to gel and play as a team. I’d hate to be Phil Steele trying to keep track of all of this stuff.
-
UteButters
ParticipantQB: B … Dampier is solid but needs to improve consistency throwing the ball. The backups are up in the air … Nate Johnson is playing receiver, but he’s a good security blanket for the group.
RB: B+ to A- … The backs are performing well right now. Solid all around group. Arguably our best running back room since 2021.
WR/TE: C+ to B- … Z Williams, Whittemore, and Zipperer are going to be very good players. Tia is also someone to pay attention too. Still waiting on Singer news from NCAA. Hunter Andrews might be a star in the making at TE.
OL: A+ … Nasty group in a good way!
DEFENSE: Not worried … early during install the O had their way with the D but the D’s adjusted to Becks offense. Solid group all around! They’ll add 1-2 guys on the DL post spring. Best linebacking group in the conference. Shemwell and Stokes are guys to pay attention to at corner.
SPECIAL TEAMS: This group will take a step forward. We have a kicker who can bang it through the end zone on kickoffs. That alone will improve us.
OVERALL: I really like the team Utahs assembled. Backup QB is probably my greatest concern (PTSD From last few years) … I do think Utahs in an okay spot behind Dampier. Isaac will take a step forward being in his second year of college. Having Nate Johnson on the roster eases some anxiety’s too.
I’ll also add … I don’t think Utah has to be prolific throwing the football to be effective next year. I honestly believe if Dampier can cut down on turnovers, and just keep the D honest through the air we’re going to have a good team. I think Utah will have a top 25 rushing attack in CFB … Our O Line mixed with the rushers we have: Dampier, Parker (Other RB’s), Whittemore, Nate Johnson, H Andrews, and others will be solid. Utah just has to be effective enough through the air to keep teams honest.
-
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.