NSFW – great UofU research twitter feed

This topic has 27 replies, 10 voices, and was last updated 7 years, 9 months ago by Anonymous.

Viewing 5 reply threads

Author

Posts
- 02/03/2017 at 1:36 PM #25430
  14 3
  
  User Suspended
  Member
  
  https://twitter.com/uteboobs
- 02/03/2017 at 1:55 PM #25437
  5 1
  
  Stradlater
  Participant
  
  A treasure trove of U-ta-tas.
- 02/03/2017 at 1:56 PM #25438
  6 1
  
  AZswayze
  Participant
  
  Not sure what kind of monster gave you thumbs down on this one. I, for one, salute you.
  - 02/03/2017 at 2:03 PM #25440
    1 1
    
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    
    I didn’t give him the thumbs down. Whomever it was is likely a sexually repressed prude that lacks a sense of humor and appreciation of fine looking women OR maybe they like men instead?
  - 02/03/2017 at 2:14 PM #25443
    1 1
    
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    
    Possibly because it isn’t SFW. Links are better than embedding things.
    - 02/03/2017 at 2:20 PM #25445
      2 1
      
      AZswayze
      Participant
      
      He tagged it NSFW. You don’t have to open it.
      - 02/03/2017 at 2:37 PM #25450
        2
        
        utefansince79
        Participant
        
        Popped up on my screen without me having to click on it. It’s the kind of image that I don’t find offensive, but possibly some of my more conservative co-workers may not want to walk by and see.
        
        02/03/2017 at 3:05 PM #25473
        
        AZswayze
        Participant
        
        Really? Maybe mine is set up differently. In that case, I apologize for my earlier post..
    - 02/03/2017 at 2:34 PM #25449
      1 1
      
      Anonymous
      Inactive
      
      I can only think of a very few places thst might not be safe for work. Not buying that argument. Those pics were nowhere near some of the stuff I linked. But I have to agree links are the way to go so we dont offend someone’s delicate sensibilities
      - 02/03/2017 at 2:45 PM #25459
        1
        
        Anonymous
        Inactive
        
        Just because you don’t like the answer doesn’t make it any less true.
        
        02/03/2017 at 4:43 PM #25495
        
        Anonymous
        Inactive
        
        Psst, did you read my whole post? I agreed with you about linking. just sayin
        
        02/03/2017 at 4:57 PM #25498
        1
        
        Anonymous
        Inactive
        
        Yeah I read it. It is your usual backhanded way of accepting something but not really. I wasn’t selling an arguement for you to buy.
        
        02/03/2017 at 5:12 PM #25503
        1
        
        Anonymous
        Inactive
        
        I agreed with you about the linking, it’s my preference if I post something I think others might be averse to viewing or as you stated shouldn’t be seen by a room full of school kids.
        
        But I’m not the link police, apparently that is your role. I try to avoid telling people how they should or shouldn’t post.
        
        Lighten up you’ll live longer
        
        02/03/2017 at 6:38 PM #25512
        1
        
        Anonymous
        Inactive
        
        In your original post you accused someone of being a sexually repressed prude or possibly homosexual.
        
        Look in the mirror will ya sometime. I listed a possible reason and get your usual ufan backhanded way of saying s**t.
        
        As much as you obsess over how TDS behaves on a regular basis you should really look at yourself for how judging others works.
        
        02/03/2017 at 5:00 PM #25500
        
        Anonymous
        Inactive
        
        Here is a good litmus test IMO for what is safe for work. Would you view that material with a classroom full of grade school kids? Then it isn’t SFW.
- 02/03/2017 at 2:39 PM #25451
  2 1
  
  Riot West
  Participant
  
  @admin @Tony can we get a NSFW category so people can opt out? Asking for a friend…
  - 02/03/2017 at 2:45 PM #25461
    
    Tony (admin)
    Keymaster
    
    That’s not a bad idea. It was tagged NSFW but if someone has their personal setting to have all posts opened, they wouldn’t have had the choice right off the bat.
    - 02/03/2017 at 2:49 PM #25464
      2
      
      Anonymous
      Inactive
      
      Most idiots know you link stuff that is NSFW. Just sayin.
      - 02/03/2017 at 2:58 PM #25469
        1 1
        
        Stradlater
        Participant
        
        We’re sorry you had to see that. Truly.
        
        02/03/2017 at 3:00 PM #25470
        3
        
        Anonymous
        Inactive
        
        See the assumption is that it was me who downvoted it. I don’t care about it in the slightest. Just stating a better way of doing things. But thanks for caring.
        
        02/03/2017 at 3:04 PM #25472
        2
        
        Stradlater
        Participant
        
        You cared enough to suggest that the OP is an idiot. Just sayin.
        
        02/03/2017 at 3:11 PM #25475
        3
        
        Anonymous
        Inactive
        
        Yeah I would say he is an idiot. Apologies if you didn’t know that he was one.
        
        02/03/2017 at 3:16 PM #25476
        2
        
        Stradlater
        Participant
        
        @Tony can we get a smug, self-righteous, judgemental category so people can opt out?
        
        02/03/2017 at 3:21 PM #25478
        1
        
        Anonymous
        Inactive
        
        Irony
        
        02/03/2017 at 3:02 PM #25471
        5
        
        Anonymous
        Inactive
        
        PSA I just downvoted it. So again apologies accepted.
- 02/03/2017 at 2:54 PM #25466
  
  leftyjace
  Participant
  
  I wonder how many of those pics are UteGal’s?
  - 02/03/2017 at 5:38 PM #25505
    
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    
    don’t know but thoroughly enjoyed every last one of them!
- 02/03/2017 at 4:27 PM #25492
  1
  
  Utemachine
  Participant
  
  Single greatest thread in UteHub history. Archive it.
Author

Posts