Site-Wide Activity

Also interesting how close Texas and SMU were to winning their new conferences.

Meanwhile the only thing Utah did was maintain our rivalry with USC for the most disappointing new conference showing.

Maybe he fell in love with the campus, or the academics, or he likes to ski, or he loves the mountains….

Who cares! He CHOOSE to be a UTE!!! That’s good enough for me…

Side Note: to really look at the data, I recommend NOT hitting play and instead just tapping on each # along the bottom to progress it at your own pace and see how rankings change for the depth of the class

Ludwig’s playbook?

I would absolutely take Fifita

I think that’s already decided but the committee is rewarding conference membership over schedule. I’d rate Tennessee’s schedule at 112 and Indiana at 120, with South Carolina at 19 and Alabama tied for 5. You don’t need a committee if the only thing that matters is least losses in each conference. Just go with the 3-3-2-2-1 method

I’d take him in a heartbeat.

I don’t want him

He’s probably just great. But it won’t matter after a bit. He’ll end up the same as the rest.

Oh, they’re corrupt alright. They proved that last year when 13-0 FSU was left out of the CFP. However,i’m not certain that they can put a Bama team with two really bad losses over an SMU team with two really close losses.

Yeah, honestly, I expect that too. We’ll see if the committee has any integrity or if they are corrupt.

I predict that a committee to shoehorn Alabama into the CFP will convene first thing in the morning.

It was a last second loss and the team that lost still has a better record.

I thought about that, but I don’t think the committee will put the team that won today ahead of the team that lost.

I have the same exact teams but seeded differently. For example, I have Clemson at #12 and SMU at #11.

Money

This one really sucks even though I am not surprised by it at all.

I personally feel that both Indiana and Tennessee are in the CFP. Bama and South Carolina are not.