Couple random thoughts

This topic has 13 replies, 12 voices, and was last updated 1 year, 6 months ago by W16Ute.

Viewing 4 reply threads

Author

Posts
- 09/01/2023 at 11:22 AM #194340
  6 1
  
  NarfUte
  Participant
  
  I thought the refs did a fantastic job (Minus the PI called, which was uncalled when UF did the same to us) It’s amazing the difference between competent officials (The SEC crew) and what we’re used to in the PAC.
  
  I was also surprised at the number of FSU and Georgia fans who attended, really impressed by their UF hate – I’m sure many are local and just wanted to see Florida lose but some sitting by me flew in from ATL to make a weekend of it (and go to the national parks)
- 09/01/2023 at 11:25 AM #194346
  4
  
  EagleMountainUte
  Participant
  
  That middle judge was awful. Many of his calls were late or just wrong. The review was wrong because the initial call was wrong.
  - 09/01/2023 at 11:34 AM #194350
    3
    
    chinngiskhaan
    Participant
    
    I believe he also got in the way on 2-3 crucial plays.
- 09/01/2023 at 11:35 AM #194351
  9 1
  
  2008 National Champ
  Participant
  
  Any game that doesn’t involve 7 or more stoppages to check for targeting is a big improvement over Pac-12 refs
  - 09/01/2023 at 12:10 PM #194360
    1
    
    Central Coast Ute
    Participant
    
    Can’t argue with this
  - 09/01/2023 at 1:00 PM #194367
    
    PAC12Teams
    Participant
    
    I watched the end ASU vs CSU game. I player from SUU ejected on a block downfield for Targeting. 1 game with Pac officials, 1 ejection.
    - 09/01/2023 at 1:02 PM #194369
      
      Ute2
      Participant
      
      The targeting part of that was inexcusable. Maybe the worst targeting ever.
      
      Guys yesterday would’ve never.
    - 09/01/2023 at 1:12 PM #194374
      
      RedRocks
      Participant
      
      Strange that an SUU player was ejected from an ASU vs CSU game 😉.
      
      Jokes aside, that ASU/SUU final score does not look good for ASU…
- 09/01/2023 at 11:39 AM #194352
  1
  
  The Miami Ute
  Participant
  
  Can anybody explain to me why the 4th down pass to Piersall just the play before Florida’s TD was not called incomplete? It certainly looked like the tip of the ball hit the ground before he cradled it completely.
  - 09/01/2023 at 11:45 AM #194354
    2 2
    
    2008 National Champ
    Participant
    
    The last view showed the ball flipping but not hitting the ground. It was the lowest angle and if that was the one the Ref saw, I could see him not overturning. All of the higher angles looked like a trap but it’s got to be definitive.
    - 09/01/2023 at 12:03 PM #194359
      1
      
      The Miami Ute
      Participant
      
      Thanks for the explanation…hard to understand how the ball could flip how it did without hitting the ground first. Water under the bridge now…
  - 09/01/2023 at 12:02 PM #194358
    2
    
    alexsmith
    Participant
    
    There was also a second bounce where he clearly trapped the ball
  - 09/01/2023 at 3:08 PM #194402
    
    W16Ute
    Participant
    
    I honestly felt like I couldn’t tell if the ball hit the ground or not from the views I saw on the big screen. Wanted to watch out again when I got home to look if it was taped between his body and the ground but given what I saw I expected it to stand
- 09/01/2023 at 12:39 PM #194363
  2
  
  utefansince79
  Participant
  
  Reviews were apparently deemed inconclusive. Doubt very much had it been ruled a trap at first that the review would have reversed the call.
  
  Agree on the above statement that it was nice not to have multiple reviews for targeting on clean hits.
Author

Posts