Fuel for the Pac-12 conspiracy theory
Welcome to Ute Hub › Forums › Utah Utes Sports › Football › Fuel for the Pac-12 conspiracy theory
- This topic has 16 replies, 13 voices, and was last updated 6 years, 5 months ago by
Chidojuan.
-
AuthorPosts
-
-
-
ironman1315
ParticipantI don’t think it’s much of a theory anymore.
-
ironman1315
ParticipantScott says there will not be punishment for anyone involved. He didn't think there was any mal-intent. They will no longer allow conference leadership to be involved in the replay booth decision-making process.
— Kyle Bonagura (@BonaguraESPN) October 11, 2018
-
EagleMountainUte
ParticipantWtf? No mal-intent? What about the students brains what a f**king dolt.
-
-
Grayshirt
ParticipantSmells like corruption to me. Scott wants to dismiss it like it’s NBD. This ain’t over.
-
sweetgrass
Participantno wonder these calls take an eternity
do they also consult the magic 8 ball?
ridiculous
-
Ute_tastic
ParticipantThe ESPN article is a little light on the details. Here is a more in depth article:
-
W16Ute
ParticipantThe craziest part is the officials interference wasn’t on the extremely obvious targeting against Minshew but rather the rather obvious one against USC’s Daniels. How can Scott continue to defend the no call against WSU in the wake of this bull?
-
Stone
ParticipantAgreed. The no call on Gustin hitting Minshew was more egregious and obvious (and more clearly affected the outcome of the game. So for conspiracy theorists that argue the league was supporting USC, this specific controversy would undermine the theory because the controvery involved a no call on a WSU player.
Buuuuuut, the no call on Gustin came later in the same game, so maybe the conspiracy is that at that point, the replay official was checked out and just decided he wasn’t going to call any targeting going forward after having already once been overruled by a league official. If Gustin had been called for targeting, as he should have been, WSU would have had 1st down on approximately the 10 yard line with plenty of time to score a TD for the win. And at a minimum, the chances of a blocked field goal would have greatly diminished (not to mention Gustin would have had to sit 1/2 of the Arizona game that USC barely escaped). WSU very likely is still undefeated, USC might have 3 conference losses and would probably already have fired their coach as a result. That no call had a huge impact.
-
-
Itacoatiara22
ParticipantI’m sick of Scott…this should be the last straw for his job.
-
Ute_tastic
ParticipantI think that the biggest problem with the way the PAC-12 does the replay is that the head official doesn’t see the replay. This takes the final decision and ultimately the accountability away from the head official. I think that the head/lead official in any sport should always be the one with the final say as well as be held accountable.
-
EagleMountainUte
ParticipantI noticed in the NIU game that coference gives him a monitor.
-
Xanthis
ParticipantThis is something the Big 10 is using this year. They happen to let NIU use the equipment for the Utah game or maybe the season. I can’t remember.
-
EagleMountainUte
ParticipantI thought they talked about in the broadcast how the MAC uses it.
-
-
-
-
SteelUte
ParticipantI wish our lame local BYU fan representatives could look into this with an audit-
-
GameForAnyFuss
ParticipantSpeaking of that, whatever happened to the BYU-P booster guy who was reviewing their replays and throwing calls in their favor? Is he at the bottom of Utah Lake or something?
-
Chidojuan
ParticipantCould be, but you’d still be able to hear him screaming as his head would be sticking out of the water.
-
-
-
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.