Next:
Utah @  Baylor
ESPN+

I heard Bill talking about whether you play a Nate Johnson package in this game

Welcome to Ute Hub Forums Utah Utes Sports Football I heard Bill talking about whether you play a Nate Johnson package in this game

Viewing 6 reply threads
  • Author
    Posts
    • #179580
      7
      rbmw263
      Participant

      ultimately I think you leave the choice up to him, but I would rather keep his RS in tact. If we lose this game, I assume Cam has no interest in playing in a meaningless Holiday or Alamo bowl, and Nate gets the start. I’d take that over playing him 2 snaps in this game.

      If we win, give Nate a couple of reps in the Rose Bowl. 

      Like I said, his opinion is the only one that should matter.

    • #179582
      belli1976
      Participant

      Is it 3 or 4 games and still get a red shirt? He has only played in two games so far

      • #179583
        6 1
        ALUF
        Participant

        4 unless something changed

      • #179586
        2
        rbmw263
        Participant

        He has played in 3

        • #179588
          belli1976
          Participant

          My bad. He didn’t have stats in the Oregon game.

      • #179587
        2
        RedUte14
        Participant

        He played in 3. He came in as a decoy one play against oregon.

    • #179584
      5
      Trailgoat
      Participant

      If Utah ends up in the Holiday bowl, no way IMO KW rolls NJ out as the starting QB against, say Texas or other ranked team. BB will get the start if CR does not play. I am guessing NJ gets his last game reps Friday to give Rising a break and mix things up. Utes need to roll out all stops to win in the CCG, regroup with a month off for recovery before the Rose Bowl. Agree on preserving NJ’s red shirt. This sounds crazy, IMO, need to be careful and not show-off too much of Nate’s talent to the money bag wolves. NIL and Transfer Portal are already starting to heat up before the December player swap meet.

      • #179596
        3
        Utesbyfive
        Participant

        My guess is that they’ll give Nate every chance to start next year. That’s one huge reason for him not to bail on us.

    • #179589
      10
      Isaac
      Participant

      You have a conference championship on the line. You don’t care about red-shirts. If you think Nate playing gives you a better chance to win, you do it

      • #179593
        9
        Tednab
        Participant

        In todays game .. whens the last time a team has got the most out of their player .. if they’re any good they’re gone in two years .. redshirt is over rated .. play for today might not have a tomorrow

        • #179628
          3
          chinngiskhaan
          Participant

          My thoughts exactly. If he’s any good, his RS year isn’t going to mean anything. Just play the best players.

      • #179595
        SalUteopia
        Participant

        ^^ This

    • #179590
      1 1
      URow
      Participant

      Utah needs to preserve his redshirt no matter what. Also, I have no issue with JJ taking wildcat snaps. He has confidence in himself and his ability that was lacking earlier in the season.  He’s not as fast as Johnson, but he is a lot bigger and can probably provide a 15-20 yard pass or run as QB if needed. 

    • #179622
      gandalf
      Participant

      I’ll never understand why he played against Stanford.

      • #179688
        DataUte
        Participant

        I think to get something on tape for Oregon to have to worry about

    • #179623
      10
      Utah
      Participant

      Don’t worry about the redshirt. Do what you need to do to win. 

      If he’s good enough to start next fall, he’s not here four more years. If he’s not good enough to start next fall, he’s not here for four more years. 

      You play him and his RS is not a decider at all. 

      • #179718
        Charlie
        Participant

        I agree. Most likely our QB will not start here for more than 2 years, a third year is coverage for injury and such. A third year may also happen if missing some games pushes a QB out to an undrafted FA but another year is likely to change draft status. Nate will be good and 3 more years will be adequate. Possibly, there may be thinking that NJ is key to helping Barns if something happened to Rising and trying to minimize that to one game. Bowl prep does allow for time to put together more of a package for NJ.

Viewing 6 reply threads
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.