Interesting look at which teams are typically overhyped and which are not
Welcome to Ute Hub › Forums › Utah Utes Sports › Football › Interesting look at which teams are typically overhyped and which are not
- This topic has 8 replies, 8 voices, and was last updated 6 years, 8 months ago by
KiYi-Ute.
-
AuthorPosts
-
-
Stone
ParticipantLast 10 seasons, Conference Media Predictions vs. Actual Finish
Most Overrated:
-18 Texas
-11 Tennessee
-10 Michigan
-8 FSU
-8 USCMost Underrated:
+17 Kansas St
+12 Iowa St
+10 Oklahoma St
+9 Boston College
+8 Missouri— Pick Six Previews (@PickSixPreviews) July 29, 2018
-
ironman1315
ParticipantI wonder where Utah fits.
-
UteThunder
ParticipantAssuming I scored it the same way they did, our score would be -1 for the last 10 years.
MWC:
2008 – Picked 2nd, Finished 1st
2009 – Picked 3rd, Finished 3rd
2010 – Picked 2nd, Finished 2nd
Pac-12:
2011 – Picked 3rd, Finished 2nd*
2012 – Picked 2nd, Finished 5th**
2013 – Picked 5th, Finished 5th***
2014 – Picked 5th, Finished 5th****
2015 – Picked 5th, Finished 2nd*****
2016 – Picked 3rd, Finished 3rd
2017 – Picked 2nd, Finished 5th
*In 2011 we had the 3rd best record in the division, but I listed us 2nd since USC was serving a post-season ban and had we beaten Colorado, we would have technically won the division.
**In 2012 we finished 5th, but we had the 4th best record in the division. USC and ASU tied for 2nd place.
***In 2013 we finished 5th, but we had the 4th best record in the division. USC and UCLA tied for 2nd place.
****In 2014 we finished 5th, but we had the 3rd best record in the division. USC, UCLA, and ASU all tied for 2nd place.
*****In 2015 we actually tied for 1st but lost out on the tie-breaker.
Our score would be +3 if given credit for what our record was in the division rather than what place we finished, if that makes sense. In other words, in 2014 we were picked 5th and finished in 5th place but we had the 3rd best record so we would be scored +2 for that season.
-
RiseasUtes
ParticipantIt’s based on pre-season ranking/final ranking not position in conference, still interesting though.
-
UteThunder
ParticipantAre you sure? It says “CONFERENCE Media Predictions vs Actual Finish” . . .
-
-
-
-
PlainsUte
ParticipantSpot on! and some people are putting Texas in their top 10 this year. I heard Phil Steele even did that.
Since this is about the media polls for conference placement, Big-12 media this year progs Texas at 4th.
Tennessee has yet to return to its glory days and Harbaugh hasn’t pulled a miracle at Michigan.
-
Chidojuan
ParticipantThis year might be Harbaugh’s year though. Especially with the Ohio State program in distress.
-
-
CincyUte
ParticipantIt appears teams are more likely to have an extreme score when they are in a conference without divisions (like the B12).
i.e., a team gaining +2 points in a division one season might gain +4 or +5 that season if the entire conference standings were taken into account.
Similarly, a team playing in a division with seven schools (like the SEC, ACC and B10) is more likely to have an extreme score than a team playing in a six school division (like the P12).
-
KiYi-Ute
ParticipantI wonder when (if ever) Tennessee and Texas are going to stop getting preseason hype after extremely mediocre previous seasons.
-
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.