Next:
Utah @  Baylor
ESPN+

Maybe this has already been discussed here, but

Welcome to Ute Hub Forums Utah Utes Sports Football Maybe this has already been discussed here, but

Viewing 7 reply threads
  • Author
    Posts
    • #18203
      Larry B
      Participant

      Why did we not have someone in the backfield on the Browning pooch punt? There was NO WAY Washington was going for it on 4th and 8 at midfield. Even if you don’t have Boobie back there, at least have a safety there.

       

      That IMO was the worst coaching decision of the game and was the reason we lost. Even if we had started at the 10 yard line we could have run clock and got into scoring range. Shoulda woulda coulda, I guess.

    • #18204
      voxnihili
      Participant

      IIRC, the returner ran up to cover an uncovered receiver. If he doesn’t do that, Browning options out to a pass for an easy first down opportunity. That’s the reason Washington runs that QB punt.

    • #18205
      4
      UtahUteGuy
      Participant

      Nonsense.  The reason we lost is because Washington is a slightly better team.  One moment in a game can’t be “the reason we lost”.  Our fans are unbelievable sometimes.

      • #18207
        Larry B
        Participant

        @UtahUteGuy

         

        I agree that Washington is the better team. But having a 90 yard field with over 3 minutes in the game and one of the best field goal kickers in the country? I’ll take that all day. But instead we had a 99 yard field which gave our punter no room to get off a good kick.

    • #18212
      GameForAnyFuss
      Participant

      @Larry B

      I disagree about the punt – he got off a great punt. The problem was it was too great. When I saw it leave his foot I said to my neighbor “uh oh, he just outkicked his coverage.” Sure enough…

    • #18237
      Utahute72
      Participant

      There were actually two guys down in time to cover the punt, but one was taken out by a block in the back.

    • #18278
      dleto
      Participant

      Also, one thing that people are forgetting is that we’re lucky we didn’t get called for too many men on the field on that play.  There was someone relatively deep.  I couldn’t tell if he was set to receive the ball or not.  But when the camera panned with the ball, there was a Utah player RUNNING OFF THE FIELD!  And there was a D lineman who was really late getting on the field.  So we either had too many men or only 10 on the field.  Something was botched.  Coaches definitely should have called a timeout and we were lucky to not get hit with a penalty.

    • #18280
      1
      Utahute72
      Participant

      I don’t think Washington looked like a clearly better team (and I think the voters who watched the game agreed). That game was really close and each team had some good plays and some bad ones. A classic college football game. I bet that if those teams played 10 times the split would be 5-5 or 6-4 either way.

    • #18284
      Dhisatake
      Participant

      So 9 out of 10 times even with the pooch kick Utah ends up with better field position. And 40 percent of the time Utah ends up with a touch back and starts on the 20.

      You might be able to argue why didn’t Utah take a time out at that point and get a better plan like go with a Cover 1 and have the safety drop back if it is a pooch kick but otherwise Washington completes a pass and coverts fourth down.

Viewing 7 reply threads
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.