Next:
Utah @  TCU
ESPN+

Pac-12-10 Name?

Welcome to Ute Hub Forums Utah Utes Sports Football Pac-12-10 Name?

Viewing 7 reply threads
  • Author
    Posts
    • #176970
      2
      Tony (admin)
      Keymaster

      When USC and UCLA are gone, and assuming there are no replacements, is the Pac-12 going to be renamed back to the Pac-10? Seems like maybe a rebrand would be in order to just “Pac.” 

       

    • #176971
      8
      EagleMountainUte
      Participant


      Conference formerly know as PAC12 

       

    • #176972
      3
      EagleMountainUte
      Participant


      Escape from LA….

    • #176976
      4
      DrahtUte
      Participant

      It’s our conference now and tying the name to the number of teams is a pain. Let’s just make it what we want and honor Ty Jordan and Aaron Lowe at the same time.

      It will now be the PAC-22 conference!

    • #176977
      2
      cj13
      Participant

      BIG12 and 10 don’t have the same number of teams as their number either

      • #176980
        7
        Utah
        Participant

        True, true, true…My only add would be to rename the PAC-12 to the PAC-10. That is what is has always been. We will be at 10 teams, we will be in the PAC10. Let’s go back. 

        And then when USC and UCLA come back in 5 years, we can just keep it at the PAC-10. 

    • #176983
      9
      ProudUte
      Participant

      Just call it PAC.  We don’t need a number.  If we add teams later – we won’t need to change it again.

       

    • #176998
      2
      PlainsUte
      Participant

      Pac-N, Pac-11-MOL (more-or-less)
      Pac-N could lead to some creative show names on the Network, Pac-N-Heat, Pac-N-Lunch, etc.

    • #177006
      2
      AlaskaSteveUteAlum
      Participant

      I’m not sure that they will actually go to the Big Ten. There will be major hurdles to overcome:
      1) A large number of alumni and fans don’t like the move.
      2) Travel to away games won’t be easy for their fans
      3) Many of their away games will be played early for the Pacific time zone.
      4) The increased school payout may not cover the travel costs for all sports.
      5) Logistical scheduling issues with a 16 team conference may become a negative for the schools and their fans.
      6) A possible increase in school payout negotiated by the PAC-12 may substantially reduce the difference between them and the Big Ten.

      This may appear as wishful thinking, but I think that they are legitimate issues.

      • #177014
        2
        Charlie
        Participant

        Is there a commit date for the LA schools still coming?

      • #177023
        4
        Extra Medium
        Participant

        There are $80-$100M reasons a year they will be going to the Big X. USC and UCLAs presidents torpedoed expansion and nixed the $1B joint venture with the PAC-12 network that would have solidified the conference for the next 10-15 years then bailed. I hope they go the big X and get their asses kicked every single year and lose all their fans because nobody in California cares about Iowa, Northwestern, Minnesota or Nebraska. Screw them…I wish were were invited though.

      • #177036
        wcrunner
        Participant

        $$$$$$$

         

Viewing 7 reply threads
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.