So, are the powers in the Pac 12 regretting over turning the targeting call?

This topic has 14 replies, 12 voices, and was last updated 6 years, 3 months ago by Dwight89.

Viewing 9 reply threads

Author

Posts
- 11/16/2018 at 11:37 AM #78066
  3 1
  
  ProudUte
  Participant
  
  Had WSU won that game – they would be in the mix for the final four. That one over turned call may have cost the conference big time. It was a horrible call at the time and now it really stings. HUGE mistake!!!
- 11/16/2018 at 11:45 AM #78070
  3
  
  Xanthis
  Participant
  
  The targeting call that was overturned was when a Wazzu player hit JT Daniels while he was taking a knee. The over turned call favored Wazzu.
  - 11/16/2018 at 12:17 PM #78079
    1
    
    SalUteopia
    Participant
    
    Let me clarify some more. He is referenig to Jayden Daniels of the Hallandale trio. /s
    - 11/16/2018 at 1:17 PM #78091
      1
      
      Dwight89
      Participant
      
      Great news, but wrong thread :).
  - 11/16/2018 at 12:28 PM #78080
    1
    
    ProudUte
    Participant
    
    I was referring to the no-call on Gustin. I thought (mistakenly I guess) that the third party got involved in that no-call too. It was certainly targeting and should have been called even though it was missed on the field.
- 11/16/2018 at 11:46 AM #78071
  1
  
  NarfUte
  Participant
  
  The targeting call that was overturned would have gone against WSU. The call that was missed was against porter gustin and USC. The overturning of the first call may have led the refs to not call the gustin hit, but that’s just speculation
- 11/16/2018 at 11:51 AM #78072
  2
  
  SalUteopia
  Participant
  
  If I recall correctly, the ‘third-party’ overturned call went against USC and benefited WSU. The no-call on Porter Gustin hit that Leach made a fuss about, that’s a seperate issue.
  - 11/16/2018 at 12:46 PM #78081
    3
    
    McBride of Frankenstein
    Participant
    
    ‘third party’ you mean the man who needs to be fired? what a wanker is that guy
- 11/16/2018 at 11:53 AM #78073
  
  ironman1315
  Participant
  
  If I remember right, the overturned call benefitted WSU as a WSU player targetted JT Daniels and the call you’re complaining of was actually a missed call on Gustin.
  
  I just wanted to make that clear.
- 11/16/2018 at 11:59 AM #78074
  1
  
  iamthepreacher
  Participant
  
  If my memory serves me correctly, the targeting call that was overturned ended up benefitting WSU. There was a no-call later on in the game where they should have ejected Gustin, and didn’t.
  - 11/16/2018 at 12:47 PM #78082
    
    Utahute72
    Participant
    
    Correct. It’s probably that they should regret not being consistent in the officiating of the rule. That is really the problem.
- 11/16/2018 at 12:12 PM #78075
  1
  
  EagleMountainUte
  Participant
  
  http://www.spokesman.com/stories/2018/sep/26/larry-scott-controversial-hit-from-usc-washington-/
  
  They looked at it over the weekend and Larry Scott said it was very close.
- 11/16/2018 at 12:14 PM #78076
  2
  
  SalUteopia
  Participant
  
  I am still not clear on this topic.
- 11/16/2018 at 12:15 PM #78077
  1
  
  Central Coast Ute
  Participant
  
  I’ve been wondering about this too. You’d have to believe that they are. WSU not only has a loss, but now it’s turned into a loss to a very average team.
- 11/16/2018 at 12:50 PM #78084
  1
  
  AlohaUte
  Participant
  
  I think you are mistaking that for the missed targeting call that should have been called on USC when Wazzu was driving down the field in their last drive. It would have given them a first down and put them well into field goal range. It was an egregious non call as it was text book targeting. Way moreso than the BS that has been called across the conference since.
Author

Posts