Why in the world do they have to go for two-point conversion attempts after two overtimes? That’s really unfair because it puts a s**t load of pressure on the teams to score on their first play. There’s a reason why teams don’t go for two very often unless they absolutely have to: BECAUSE TWO-POINT ATTEMPTS ARE EXTREMELY UNSUCCESSFUL USUALLY. There’s no way Utah goes for two on their last touchdown tonight if they didn’t have to. They had all the momentum (as they had just overcome a two touchdown lead in like four minutes), and said momentum likely would have carried over into overtime. I HATE the college overtime rules BTW. They change the game back to a level playing field for no reason. Especially in that third overtime, where the outcome of one play per team literally either ends or prolongs the game. At least give them four downs to score. If they are worried about injuries, just freaking let the games finish tied! Why is that so horrible? If one team isn’t superior to the other on a particular day, let them finish tied! The NFL does it ALL THE FREAKING TIME. IMHO, the NFL overtime rules are FAR SUPERIOR to their college counterparts. Make teams kick off and have to go the length of the field for scores. This bulls**t of arbitrarily putting the ball on their opponent’s 25-yard line is ridiculous. Put in the NFL rule! If a team scores a touchdown on their first possession (the “golden” score), the game instantly ends. If not, it continues on for a set amount of time, and if neither team gains the lead after that extra period (even if it is just a field goal or safety), the game is declared a tie. Why is that so unacceptable at the college level? You could even put in a point system, similar to hockey or soccer, in that you get 3 points for a win and 1 for a tie (or similar) and the team at the end of the season with the most points wins their divisions/leagues. That would be a far better system than the ridiculous crap Utah had to go through last night.
Mississippi Valley State @ 
Utah .
