Next:
Oklahoma State @  Utah
ESPN+

Two changes to targeting that NEED to be implemented . . .

Welcome to Ute Hub › Forums › Utah Utes Sports › Football › Two changes to targeting that NEED to be implemented . . .

Viewing 1 reply thread
  • Author
    Posts
    • 11/17/2018 at 3:18 PM #78459
      8
      UteThunder
      Participant

      1. In order for there to be an ejection, the call must be CONFIRMED rather than just “the call stands” as happened with Chase today. How in the world can you eject/suspend a player when you can’t even confirm that they committed the foul?

      2. Allow for some incidental contact, even with a lowering of the crown of the helmet. So many times we see a glancing blow get called targeting and it was just a good tackle that ended up with just a tiny bit of helmet to helmet contact.

    • 11/17/2018 at 3:38 PM #78473
      5
      Distantute
      Participant

      The ejection should only be for the current quarter and next.  This was a 4qtr ejection.  Entirely too punitive.  

      • 11/17/2018 at 3:49 PM #78488
        1
        UteThunder
        Participant

        I agree, the ejection/suspension needs to be more uniform. Why should Chase miss basically an entire game but someone who commits the same foul on the last play of the 4th quarter only misses one half of the next game?

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 1 reply thread
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.