U to study feasibility of stadium expansion

This topic has 16 replies, 12 voices, and was last updated 7 years, 8 months ago by pedro.

Viewing 5 reply threads

Author

Posts
- 03/27/2017 at 8:32 AM #31835
  6
  
  Tony (admin)
  Keymaster
  
  The study will provide the University valuable data in evaluating demand and determining potential revenue sources.https://t.co/j4W5vVZyXG
  
  — Utah Athletics (@utahathletics) March 27, 2017
- 03/27/2017 at 8:39 AM #31836
  2
  
  Utah
  Participant
  
  And so it begins. Woohoo!
- 03/27/2017 at 10:07 AM #31844
  
  leftyjace
  Participant
  
  So… let’s say they DO expand.
  
  Does anybody think that current ticket prices might go down a little as a result of greater availability?
  - 03/27/2017 at 10:13 AM #31845
    
    Guba
    Participant
    
    Nope! If anything I think they will go up. There is a chance they could stay the same but I doubt it.
  - 03/27/2017 at 10:15 AM #31847
    3
    
    Tony (admin)
    Keymaster
    
    Have ticket prices EVER gone down?
  - 03/27/2017 at 11:34 AM #31854
    1
    
    rbmw263
    Participant
    
    the average ticket price MIGHT fall, because the added seats look to be cheaper corner/endzone seats. But a ticket on the 20 yd line row 45 will still be every bit as much as it is now. There will be more low end options available but seat to seat no chance in hell the price drops
- 03/27/2017 at 11:17 AM #31849
  
  rbmw263
  Participant
  
  How is this different from what they did a few years ago when they released a mockup and everything? Maybe a little more in depth. All this (plus history) tells me is we are maybe 5 years away from being 5 years away from expansion
  - 03/27/2017 at 11:32 AM #31853
    
    Guba
    Participant
    
    It looks like this will be an in depth look at the market, funding options, design options, etc. If things go well I wouldn’t be surprised to be ready to start construction as early as this year after the football season is over. Otherwise I would think after the 2018 season.
    - 03/27/2017 at 12:01 PM #31856
      
      Utahute72
      Participant
      
      Yea, it looks like a study to develop in depth cost/benefit analysis of the project.
- 03/27/2017 at 1:21 PM #31868
  2
  
  Utah
  Participant
  
  Hopefully Pershing has some leverage when it comes to the legislature now.
  
  Hughes said that the state could not do anything like the audit again, because the politcal fallout was much, much worse than he ever thought and no one would back that again.
  
  That being said, Pershing can now so to the Legislature and say, “we need more money for expansion. If you can’t help, we will have to drop the BYU game to add another home game the off years (instead of playing in Provo) and then bring in a better named opponent the years BYU would have played in SLC to pay for it. Especially seeing how many, many teams bring in bigger crowds than BYU.”
  
  There is a reason why this is being done now, and the audit is part of it.
  - 03/27/2017 at 6:18 PM #31887
    
    SoUtahUte
    Participant
    
    I know for a fact that the legislature will not put money into athletics and will not allocate any funding for athletic facility construction. Those buildings have to be approved by the legislature but all finanacing is private. I had a conversation with Chris Hill a few months ago and he told me that when they expand they will close in the south end zone and put more luxury boxes above that area which would decrease the net gain in seats. Apparantly there is a big demand for more boxes. We would get more seats but not a huge number, probably a few thousand.
    - 03/27/2017 at 6:57 PM #31888
      1
      
      PorterRockwell
      Participant
      
      Don’t they subsidize the other in state schools athletics to some extent?
      - 03/27/2017 at 9:00 PM #31899
        1
        
        UteThunder
        Participant
        
        The other in state schools didn’t “steal” BYU’s spot in the Pac-12 and leave them in the dust. Hughes and the other BYU fanboy legislators will do anything and everything in their power to handcuff Utah athletics going forward.
    - 03/28/2017 at 3:45 PM #31940
      
      pedro
      Participant
      
      It would be a shame to put boxes in the SE. Take that view out? No thanks!
- 03/27/2017 at 9:29 PM #31908
  
  Anonymous
  Inactive
  
  I think the NEZ should pay for the SEZ.
  - 03/28/2017 at 7:23 AM #31914
    1
    
    GameForAnyFuss
    Participant
    
    I’m pretty sure contractors don’t accept food stamps for payment.
    
    Sorry…NEZ jokes never get old. 😉
  - 03/28/2017 at 7:39 AM #31916
    
    Tony (admin)
    Keymaster
    
    I think the NEZ should pay for the SEZ.
    
    And everyone has the right to tickets.
Author

Posts