But what burden does USC or Oregon have from past coaches contracts still being paid out? They may have much better revenue, but if they’ve been careless with their costs to run their program, overpaid or fired coaches, overspent on facilities compared to the number of wins and revenue they get, this will hurt their current valuation.
I assume it’s a basic discounted cash flow model. Utah is frugal, gets decent revenue and doesn’t spend more than it has. Take the present value of future positive cash flows at a market discount rate…there you go…maybe….
Right? Like we could put together an investment group, buy Alabama for $101mm, lean it up, and sell it for $202mm, right? Hypothetically, if these weren’t state owned entities.