[alUmnUs]

Both of these teams SUCK!

[alUmnUs]

It’s a good start. We need more. We need a WR corps.

[alUmnUs]

Wide receivers. We need elite ones.

I’m not interested in any other chicken little theories.

[alUmnUs]

That’s okay. They don’t need to get drunk to become obnoxious assholes.

[alUmnUs]

Unfortunately, I think it will drop no matter what in the Big 12. Week-to-week top matchups in the Big 12 will have heavy regional appeal, but marginal national appeal, except for when it comes to Colorado as that brand is a ratings outlier. For the foreseeable future, Colorado will be a high draw. It will be nice to have a Saturday CCG. The ratings for that game will be much higher than they ever were in the PAC12.

[alUmnUs]

Or, the Utah product IS actually augmenting the ratings. 🙄

[alUmnUs]

Sounds like KW confirmed this morning they still need to get more WRs. Makes sense.

[alUmnUs]

I’m a non-Mormon, POC thriving in Utah. Thanks.

[alUmnUs]

You’re welcome. It will be shocking to see longtime Big12 teams start to develop good seasons.

And since hardly anyone here will recognize how historically poor Utah WR corp has been and continues to be, I just chalk it up to low football IQ since everyone would much rather hand-wring about the disadvantages of SLC as a desirable destination as opposed to places like Tucson & Waco. I mean, Boulder and Phoenix have just been too much to handle in the PAC12 era, right?

Also, your quip about “inner-city” kids is ridiculous. For example, if the athlete is black and good and from out of state, they must be inner-city kids that are looking for a way out? That’s ridiculous. Lots of recruits of color are not just coming from s**t places and circumstances while they’ve worked their asses off in a resource filled world (which their families do invest in to the athletes benefit) to become recruitable football players.

[alUmnUs]

What receivers?

[Author]

Posts