Chidojuan

Vitriol?  Don’t see where you get that.  It was an honest question.  USC was not eligible for the post season that year, if that doesn’t weaken the conference, I don’t know what does.  UA was good, not great.  The South was competetive, the North was weak.  Oregon demolished UA in the Pac-12 Championship game, so I stand by calling that loss…[Read more]

Hasn’t Utah covered the spread in every game this season outside of SC?

I agree that it’s an excuse. I think that point of view is not as strong as it used to be. For me, I mostly see us as a cold weather school that is not a blue blood or household name. The MSU comparison you made was very applicable, except Sparty is way more of a household name. Add in the fact that some of the warm weather schools are using o…[Read more]

I agree, but the nice thing about the remaining schedule is that we don’t have anyone we are looking ahead to. We don’t even know if Oregon wins the North. I’m confident that they will, but that would be silly to prep for them at this point. We don’t have anyone singled out. They won’t overlook anyone because there is no one to look ahead to.

ASU got caught napping after that game with us. Colorado has no defense. UCLA has talent, their OL is marginally better than ASU’s. DTR is more athletic than Daniels, but doesn’t take care of the football as well. I see us giving up 10 points at the max, probably less. Their D has gotten more aggressive, so we pull a UW and make them res…[Read more]

Out according to reddit.

Week 10 Match-up Preview Thread: Washington Huskies vs. #10 Utah Utes
by inCFB

They’re getting up there with Stanford in injuries. Must have done something pretty stupid to warrant the suspension.

The over/under was 38.5, I don’t know if that moves like the spread, so at this point, it would be 31-10 Utes.

Just not a season ender per the presser.

Please let it be the 56-7 outcome!

I’m actually with you on the tin foil hat, but my theory is that the PAC-12 refs are penalizing aggression. On both sides of the ball. Maybe there is some fear of a lawsuit somewhere so they’re playing it safe, maybe they’re trying to set an example for other conferences, or maybe they all just have low testosterone and can’t handle it. Maybe a…[Read more]

Is this like the PAC-12 circle of suck? The only team not in the circle is Oregon, but they’re the connector to the SEC circle of suck.

Yup, hard to root for the favorite over the underdog, but I want the South broken and bleeding with Utah as the clear winner. Rooting for Oregon over CU is especially difficult, but if it helps Utah, I can deal with it.

Part of that is Ludwig scheming to what the OL gives him. I was overly optimistic about them at the beginning of the year, but they are not BAD, just average. They rank in the middle of the NCAA I think, I’ll look at the stats when I can. I really believe they got complacent with SC, which is the exact wrong team to get complacent against, a…[Read more]

Don’t think anyone ever thought it was anything more than a wet paper bag. Everyone was worried about the offense and our own being able to score enough points to keep up.

Pac-12 after dark is just another name for the Demon Lord of Chaos.

The riddle… of STEEL!

OOC doesn’t matter right now. All that matters is winning. Maybe it matters in the future after the playoff is expanded. Right now, the goal for every P5 team is a playoff seed. Slim chance for most teams, but the formula is simple, win. Clemson’s conference schedule is probably the weakest it’s ever been. That’s the CONFERENCE. OOC is prob…[Read more]

2nd road game will do that to you.