[Luke R]

I like it because just like everything else I have heard or read they pretty much burry the lead. Utah completely dominated the game until OK St last 2 drives. We had the ball for 42 minutes and had a true freshman at qb. Their offense couldn’t do anything but still all anyone wants to talk about is what Ok St needs to do to get right. I hope everyone keeps sleeping on the Utes. I mean when you watch or listen to national media they just skip over Utah. Coach Whitt loves it too.

[Luke R]

I think the biggest difference is that the Utes feel comfortable letting Wilson do more than they ever did Barnes. Last year felt miserable because you knew there were some games we just couldn’t win without a qb who could make “some” plays/throws.

[Luke R]

Sorry auto correct made it a buy week😂

[Luke R]

I think we may have some recency bias on this. Part of this is because we have only been picked or favored to win away games against good teams over the last several years. To be honest I think you have to have a good defense to stand a chance to beat a good team on the road which Utah does have. You also have to bring some offense which Utah has not had on a consistent basis. If you can score or at least get some exciting offensive plays you can take the crowd out of the equation. If you don’t and try to win with just defense and special teams you will loose most of the time.

[Luke R]

When you look at 247 do you look at total ranking or average recruit?

Also is there a way to figure in transfer portal losses? Maybe some type of Net Transfer Portal ranking?

[Luke R]

Lohner catches – under (sorry)
Qb running – oh thats a good one….under
Int – under
Penalty Yards – Utah under and AZ way over
Az int – push???
Fumble recovery – under
Special teams td – under
TOP – over

[Luke R]

Haha that is a great O/U. We might have to see that one later this year. Just for fun!

[Luke R]

I really like the matchup of one of the best teams at not giving up a sack against one of the best teams at getting sacks. It. Should be fun to watch.

[Luke R]

I like the extra point.

[Luke R]

I agree that Cal and Stanford want to be in that conference but they should really think about it.

I am not sure what their exit fees are but if they are the same as FSU and Clemson this conversation is over.

If it is not much which is what I think. The FSU lawsuit says they are fee’d 3 years of revenue or something like that. Well Cal and Stanford are not taking Revenue for 9 or 10 years. So they would be way better of financially but I am not sure their Academic Pride can handle that.

[Author]

Posts