ironman1315

Good dudes. Had to laugh at them hoping for one one ones against our DBs.

Don’t we all, from what I heard from Whitt on the presser or on the twitters Bam isn’t likely to be approved (or not because NCAA) in the next two ish weeks.

poo poo

Yeah, how ’bout no.

Utah would be nice.

1 sack. But it looked like a lot of containment and central pressure. Flush him, attack him, force a mistake or 5 (two were deadly).

Although I use the term loosely.

If you read the article, I believe they have the methodology in there.

Turnovers change games. The next big game changer is explosive plays. If you can get an offense that can get explosive plays and limit turnovers and coupe that with a defense that makes turnovers. Man, I hope we get that right balance between ball control and explosion.

Shouldn’t it be BYU -poopoo?

He done

https://twitter.com/allcfb_/status/1168273362205970432?s=21

Haven’t watched, know nothing of Fresno, but is it out athleting a clearly inferior opponent, or is it new scheme?

I have disagreed with literally everyone that posts on this board. Never have I found them disagreeable. Whitlessham, he is disagreeable. And the value he adds to this board is a net negative.

Dunno, first games are tough to get much from. However, I think that they should be pretty good. But, isn’t this defense essentially the same we played last year?

And then he will create a new account, then another then another then another. Better for the board to just IP ban him.

Seriously, can we IP ban this douche canoe?

Gee, you’d better call up the AD. Who would have thought.

It’s nice that you’re not clever enough to not put your sock puppets.

Also, he’s a sophomore.

Also, he had several tackles.

Also, any time Whitless agrees with you is a sign that you’re wrong. Although that by itself is certainly not dispositive.