Next:
Colorado @  Utah
ESPN+

snorkerelli

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 5 reply threads
  • Author
    Posts
    • #240220
      2 1
      snorkerelli
      Participant

      This is good. We do way better as underdogs. When we started getting respect from pundits we fell off a cliff (e.g. last two seasons). All that matters is where we end up next year.

    • #238247
      1
      snorkerelli
      Participant

      Dampier. Duh.

    • #238245
      2 2
      snorkerelli
      Participant

      No thanks. I’ve liked every Utah quarterback in the last 20 years. They haven’t all been great but I’ve liked them. Wilson is different. It’s an attitude thing. Hopefully he transfers next year.

    • #237079
      3
      snorkerelli
      Participant

      Good riddance. He was a plague on the team since he signed.

    • #235539
      1
      snorkerelli
      Participant

      Isaac Wilson continued to look like a deer in the headlights several games in. It seemed his decision making time got worse, not better as the season went on. It’s pretty bad when your 5th string comes in and looks more confident and competent than the injured starter. Hell, Bottari seemed much better than Wilson and I doubt Bottari would start for any other power 4 team.

    • #232897
      snorkerelli
      Participant

      And Wilson’s gone for sure next year. Good riddance. He doesn’t have the it factor. I’d rather see the quarterback situation start from scratch.

    • #239542
      1 4
      snorkerelli
      Participant

      So… what I’m getting after summarizing the above posts is that Beck is likely better at handling his Johnson than Ludwig, Nate’s going to be a receiver, not a giver, unless you drop the soap and the all bets are off because Nate is nasty? What site am I on?

    • #238718
      2
      snorkerelli
      Participant

      Rick, I appreciate the sentiment. You have a nice day as well. In fact, meet for tacos next Tuesday? 😁

    • #238644
      3 2
      snorkerelli
      Participant

      Rick, thanks for the suggestion. It seemed genuine until you made the therapist dig. Not sure why you are responding to me if you’re trying to weed out political speech on this site. I was responding to another post with a not so subtle political dig, just in a more obvious way so those of you that can’t seem to hear the dog whistles can understand. In your little group, do you also make a suggestion to your “friends” that they see a therapist because they have a different viewpoint than you? I bet that goes over well. What a bridge builder you are.

    • #238629
      5 4
      snorkerelli
      Participant

      I see what you’re saying Gilly Boy. Like when JD Vance used his “elitist” degree from Yale law to network with the very folks that led to him making millions in venture capital with the very same tech moguls in SanFrancisco who’s kids are now attending Cal. The very same tech moguls that donated large sums of money to an unnamed GOP presidential candidate about to take office. The very same president that has the heaviest hand in “social experimentation” in modern history by nominating a Supreme Court that just reversed 50 years of settled law without any sort of societal mandate. I get what you’re saying. That’s what you meant, right?

Viewing 5 reply threads